The Guardian
trending topics

Does The BBC Still Believe In Digital?

  • Comments Comments (View)
  • Text Size: A A

Yesterday, the BBC’s director general Mark Thompson launched a new strategy document outlining the future direction of the BBC.

Beneath the headlines about the cuts to its digital radio and online activities, what does the BBC’s positioning tell us about not just the corporation’s own priorities, but about the digital content landscape for broadcasters? And why is this important for the wider media industry?

When the BBC sneezes, much of the rest of the world’s media catches a cold.

This is not just a UK story. In every country I have visited as an analyst, clients want to talk to me about what the BBC is doing. In the UK, the BBC is the market leader in TV and radio, while online, it is the only UK-sourced web site in the top 10 destination for UK internet users. Internationally the BBC retains an impressive international footprint. 

Under pressure, it has cut back on new platforms to prop up established services.

Facing ever-increasing demands for its services, the BBC has been under financial pressure, ratcheted up by commercial rivals and politicians from both main parties. But given a) the BBC’s legacy of creating new platforms for digital content, b) the long-term shift towards multi-platform and on-demand digital content, and c) the growth in time spent online, its decision to re-focus £600 million on high end TV content seems a retrograde step. 

Successful digital services still cost a fraction of core TV channels

The proportion of the BBC’s budget income on its online activities remains a fraction of what it spends on TV, which is, relatively speaking, hugely expensive to create and manage. But with ‘just’ £122 million (about the same as is spent on one digital TV channel, BBC3) it creates a world-leading internet presence. With such a spectacular return on investment, why cut that back? By shoring up TV budgets, the message seems to be: the BBC is primarily a TV broadcaster – everything else is secondary

The BBC has never been just a TV broadcaster

The BBC didn’t start out as a TV broadcaster - the medium had yet to be invented in the 1920s – and only shifted its focus in the 1950s once television consumption became mainstream. Now that half of the UK’s internet users regularly visit the BBC’s web sites, and with its radio services still dominating the UK airwaves, the BBC seems reluctant to see itself as a genuinely multi-platform content provider. 

Digital remains the best route to target underserved audiences

The decision to focus on the big established channels is also a volte face from the BBC’s original strategy of using digital broadcast – such as DAB - as a means of targeting smaller, underserved audiences. The BBC’s vision recognized the key ability of digital technology to segment audiences to a degree previously unthinkable.  Online remains a key means of addressing these audiences of course, but taking stations such as 6 Music, 1 Xtra and Asian Network off DAB and slashing their programming budgets leaves any effort to reach these stations’ audiences as little more than tokenism.

The BBC has an unrivalled legacy in terms of technology-led innovation

Retrenchment from its digital remit is a missed opportunity for the BBC, especially given its striking legacy across different platforms. Just as it delivered the world’s first TV broadcast from Alexandra Palace in 1936 (just a mile or so from where I sit writing this) so the BBC has remained at the forefront of media technology. The BBC’s online news has been a pioneer of best practice and is trusted and valued around the world. The UK is the world’s largest DAB market thanks to the role of the BBC. And the UK has led the European market, at least, in online delivery of long-form video content thanks to its iPlayer, which had 120 million programme requests in January.

The BBC has lost confidence in its own vision.

The BBC has been able to innovate and experiment because of its unique funding and remit. At a time of great uncertainty in the media industry, people look to the BBC to take a lead, and it continues to do this with initiatives such as Project Canvas. But ironically it seems that Mark Thompson does not ‘get’ digital in the way that even his much-maligned predecessor John Birt did. And while consumption of media continues to evolve with the rise of on-demand content across different platforms (as we shall see in upcoming Forrester reports) the BBC’s response seems lacking in conviction. Where the BBC once led fearlessly, it now seems fearful and curiously out of step. 

Nick Thomas is an analyst at Forrester Research, where he serves, and contributes to the Forrester blog for Consumer Product Strategy professionals.

Mar 3, 2010 9:18 AM ET

Nick Thomas, Forrester

Share

Posted In: Companies, BBC

  • People here may interested in this response from the BBC:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2010/03/does_the_bbc_still_believe_in.html

    Nick Reynolds (social media executive, BBC Online)

  • Wibble Wobble

    Couldn’t have put it better myself - this whole episode is about Murdoch’s clan trying to weaken the BBC. It’s perfectly acceptable to allow the ‘market’ (aka cash from private investors seeking a return remember; not a salient being in itself capable of making the best decisions; see ‘banks’) to come up with alternartives and solutions, but when all they’ve been capable of in for example, radio (best seen in London, with Heart, Capital and Magic) is fighting for the same listener profiles with a small difference in age or demographic it’s hardly encouraging for the future is it? Sky is niche high-cost film and sport subscription. Their aim with everything is to deliver shareholders a return, not to produce anything discernable as ‘good’ output (if there is an objective definition of such a thing). It’s also worth remembering that given that the ground broadcasters fight on now is one of output delivered by platforms, not telly on a box in the corner of the living room, and so BSkyB and its proxies forcing the BBC to focus more on the 20th Century approach is a victory for the bullies, and a defeat for the British people IMO.

    What people need to remember is that in the absence of real cultural and political identifiers in the UK, a body like the BBC and I’d also say the NHS are very much glue that binds us together. If we lose that glue we have to have something to replace it.

  • Hulu in the US have the clout to have their ISPs close down blocks of IP addresses on VPNs that are set up to circumvent access outside the US.

    Likewise BBC iPlayer has restrictions outside the UK.

    Interestingly Europa here in Spain has FTA UK content (Freeview) rebroadcast as multicast from a dish in Madrid http://www.europa-network.com/tv

    This UK Freeview content is free to ADSL subscribers with a 3 mb Europa subscription.

    It would be nice to know what income stream the BBC derives from this free re broadcast, or is Europa merely borrowing the FTA signal.

    Here is their legal page:-

    Europa are approved and licensed by the Spanish Telecommunications Regulator.

    Europa TV is approved by Spanish lawyers.

    We do not charge clients anything to view our TV Service — ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

    We do not transmit ANY un-encrypted content that has been delivered encrypted (for example, no SKY content will be available).

    We do not change or “alter” the content or add advertising. The content is delivered EXACTLY as it is in the UK.

    We pay copyright fees to the relevant organisations in Spain - (SGAE and EGEDA).

    Television without Frontiers Directive (TVFD) becomes AVMS which fully supports our business model.

    All great stuff. No wonder Sky do not want anything to do with Spain as the 760,000 British expats are well serviced by pirated signals rebroadcast as microwave or direct from the satellite.

    With the Sky satellite geostationary problems here in Spain ( BBC2 goes at 4.00 pm) and Europa providing the content free 24/7 any churn away from the traditional 2.4 meter dish installer is the beginning of the end for Sky satellite operators in Spain.

    I would be interested on your take on this regarding the future of the BBC iPlayer outside the UK

    So if we can get legal UK Freeview from Europa why can’t we enjoy the BBC iPlayer here in Spain without having to “do a Hulu” by masking IPs and VPNs and playing with proxy servers.

  • albsure

    As great as the BBC is, it most concede some ground. The BBC is a service that everyone pays for, yet it cannot be beneficial to everyone if it continually encroaches on the businesses opportunities of the private sector. It is the private sector that ultimately pays for the BBC through the taxes it’s staff pay. The BBC’s remit should be to provide services where the private sector would not be able to. However they compete with private enterprises far too much and effectively bite the hand that feeds it.

    The reason they have to concentrate on cutting digital services is that it is more likely that private firms can compete in that space. Therefore the BBC would be seen to be providing services where the private sector cannot (i.e. expensive TV programming that is beneficial to the public at large).

    It’s one thing have a huge private firm like Vodaphone or Google eating your lunch.. It’s another thing for the staff of private firms to be paying for that privilege.

Covering the UK’s Digital Media Economy | paidContent:UK Newsletter


Sponsors

Contributors