The Guardian
topics

Earnings
Earnings: Vivendi Up As Music Downloads Double, Games Grow 91.9 Percent

French media conglomerate Vivendi (EPA:VIV) posted H1 earnings of EUR 2.6 billion ($3.54 billion), 10.6 percent better than the same period last year, helped by music downloads and the wild success of World Of Warcraft.

Digital music sales from the Universal Music Group, the world’s largest label, almost doubled (at constant currency rate) but the group’s earnings fell EUR 75 million ($102.2 million) from the same period last year to EUR 220 million ($299.8 million). Universal reckoned it “significantly outperformed its competitors on an operating basis” in a difficult market.

Vivendi Games’ earnings shot up 91.9 percent from 2006 to EUR 119 million ($162 million), thanks primarily to the World Of Warcraft MMPORG and the release of The Burning Crusade expansion for that game, which grew the world’s subscriber base to over nine million.

—The Canal+ French TV unit, 65 percent owned by Vivendi, saw earnings balloon from EUR 190 million ($259 million) in the 2006 period to EUR 340 million ($463.4 million), “mainly driven by the strong performance of pay-TV operations in France”. Canal+ merged with satellite operator Television Par Satellite late last year.

—Telco division SFR, in which Vivendi has a 55.8 percent stake, posted 1.8 percent lower earnings of EUR 1.36 billion ($1.85 billion), blaming caps introduced on call charges by regulators which “do not allow SFR to benefit from the growth of traffic and use”.

—Vivendi’s 20 percent stake in NBC Universal brought in EUR 143 million ($194.9 million) this half - less than the 2006 half’s EUR 157 million ($214 million) - “solely due to the decline of the US dollar”, and is offset by the performance of French broadband provider Neuf Cegetel, in which Vivendi’s SFR has a 40.5 percent stake, which brought home EUR 31 million ($42.2 million), much better than the EUR 2 million ($2.73 million) contributed in the 2006 half.

Within the second calendar quarter, AP reports, net profit dropped 49 percent to EUR 594 million ($809.7 million) (last year’s was inflated because Vivendi sold shares in chemical company DuPont). But the company maintains its full-year net income forecast of EUR 2.7 billion ($3.68 billion), breaking its 2006 record.

Release

Aug 31, 2007 1:55 AM ET
Share

Posted In: Money, Earnings, Countries, Europe, France

  • MR

    Well, isn't this ironic…

    On the same day that NBC Universal decides it wants to cut ties with iTunes, Vivendi releases an H1 earnings report saying Universal Music Group's digital music sales DOUBLED over last year's numbers.

    As we all know, iTunes commands about 80%+ of the digital music downloads market, so essentially, iTunes was the main contributor to the near 100% rise in digital music sales by the group.

    So, if I'm a Vivendi shareholder, I hear in the same breath:  "iTunes helps double Vivendi music sales!  Vivendi wants to sever ties with iTunes!

    [FOREHEAD SLAP].

    Yes, I know music and video are separate, etc., but the trend is obviously clear.  iTunes=Leading Digital Content Store=Increased Digital Content Sales.

    This move was made simply to give NBC's still-as-yet-to-launch joint venture video content site a fighting chance when it does finally come live.

    It's them running scared.  It's them trying to tip the scales in their favor.  It's them sweating under the collar that their site may not gain any traction at launch going up the big boys, YouTube and iTunes. 

    How's this for an idea?

    Why not continue to offer both distribution channels?  It doesn't cost the company any more to upload content to another site.  Keep the content on iTunes for those people who prefer to - get this - PAY(!) to download higher-quality, commercial free content to play on their computers, TV's, or iPods…

    ANNNNNDDDDD

    ...post the "free" ad-supported (and I'm guessing non-downloadable/iPod-ready) content on an NBC-ordained video download site. 

    This doesn't have to be an Either/Or scenario, but rather Also/And.

    There is no ONE RIGHT solution for EVERYONE.  Let different audiences decide where/how it wants to digest your content.  As long as you're monetizing it, what do you care?

    The major thing a move like this does (besides cut into Vivendi's overall sales) is frustrate the consumer.  And, if the internet has taught us anything, what does the consumer do when he is frustrated with the existing distribution model in this day and age?  He steals.

    Genius move.

Covering the UK’s Digital Media Economy | paidContent:UK Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors