Kangaroo Verdict: What’s It Mean, And Where Next?
The Competition Commission’s ruling to block Kangaroo outright will go down like a lead balloon with most people except rival VOD operators. What’s it really mean… ?
SEE ALSO: MPs Rebuke BBC Trust For ‘Misleading’ On Kangaroo, Say Public Money Was Wasted
—iPlayer has no long tail: BBC, ITV (LSE: ITV) and Channel 4’s existing VOD efforts for seven-day catch-up won’t now get the hoped-for on-ramp to monetise archive shows. ITV, which has been suffering commercially and pinned many hopes on profiting from Kangaroo ads and sales, will be most worried, but Channel 4 is suffering the same fate, too. The BBC has been steadily digitising its vast archives, but has now been denied the primary channel for this material.
—Will Kangaroo be asset-stripped?: The venture formally launched in summer 2007, has 50 staff, a central London office and has been in development and, latterly, private beta testing throughout. The JV partners are sitting on a multi-million pound waste of money and, potentially, a big round of layoffs. Can it offset the lost investment by selling its technology? Hulu already has a web platform; it’s more interested in Kangaroo’s programming. Perhaps a BT (NYSE: BT) Vision or a BSkyB (NYSE: BSY) would sniff around Kangaroo’s carcass to beef up their own VOD plans?
—The ruling flies in the face of Ofcom’s grand vision: The wind in UK public service broadcasting is blowing toward greater cooperation. Ofcom’s recent public service broadcast review highlighted the BBC’s offer to share iPlayer technology, video infrastructure and even raw material with ITV and Channel 4, to help the pair through commercial uncertainty. But the commission has killed one of the big hopes that this can actually extend to making money. What’s more, its ruling directly contradicts Ofcom’s suggestion, backed by Lord Carter’s Digital Britain and other ministers, that Channel 4 should form an alliance with BBC Worldwide. In Kangaroo, the two tried exactly that- and were thwarted.
—Not necessarily a win for Joost et al: Orgs including Joost, Babelgum, BT Vision, Tiscali, Lovefilm backer Arts Alliance Media, ad body IPA and TV makers’ guild had opposed Kangaroo. Joost, in particular, has long complained it can’t compete effectively in the UK because BBC Worldwide, ITV and Channel 4 won’t licence to it their TV shows; it said Kangaroo would only “exacerbate” that problem. The Competition Commission could have accepted Kangaroo’s offer to wholesale its shows to platforms like Joost but, without a Kangaroo, that stipulation’s absence will continue to deny Joost & Co. the guarantee of the soughtafter material - unless the broadcasters decide individually to strike deals.
—UK opening for Hulu?: Often seen as an equivalent service to that across the Atlantic, we understand the NBC/News Corp (NYSE: NWS) JV was awaiting today’s verdict in order to figure out what UK TV rights it may be able to bag its own VOD offering, hoping to launch in the UK this year. We understand earlier discussions had also taken place on the possibility of Hulu providing Kangaroo’s technology platform, but Kangaroo, using knowledge gleaned from the BBC’s successful iPlayer rollout, went on to develop its own system. Hulu may have preferred to leverage Kangaroo, buying its TV rights via enforced wholesale, but its familiarity with the JV trio could suggest it can bag UK shows all the same. The irony of one JV swooping in and picking up the pieces of a JV blocked on competition grounds, would not be lost on the Kangaroo shareholders.
Posted In: Legal, Regulatory, Companies, LG
Kindle (Free)
Social Standing
Which media brands are getting a lift from Tweeters and bloggers right now -- and which are getting panned?
Show Me: