The Guardian
topics

Exclusive
Is FiLife Running On Borrowed Time?

Less than two months after talking up the turnaround at Dow Jones-IAC (NSDQ: IACI) personal finance JV FiLife, paidContent has learned the site’s continued existence is no certainty. It survived the multiple trimmings as Barry Diller cut back on IAC’s portfolio of emerging businesses, but the company is now exploring options that range from leaving it open to a sale or a full shut down. When Ezra Kucharz, president and GM for just over a year, left for CBS (NYSE: CBS) in January, both IAC and DJ credited him publicly with turning around the site and building it to the #4 personal finance site with 4.4 million unique visitors in December. Now both companies are declining comment about the site’s future.

One possibility for IAC could be selling its stake to Dow Jones (NYSE: NWS), which recently bought out SmartMoney partner Hearst. But that’s a well-established brand with an 800,000-circ magazine. Whether DJ would even want to own FiLife outright is unclear—as is whether a deal actually would involve much money. What FiLife does have—more traffic than SmartMoney.com, where personal finance is just one category, and a digital mentality. Is there a way to combine the two?

FiLife has had a bit of a tortured life from its beginning: taking more than a year to move from an idea to a blog, then taking so long to emerge from that status the plans appeared to be dormant. Dave Kansas, brought in from the Wall Street Journal to launch the site, was replaced by online vet Kucharz in late 2008. Adam Wiener, executive editor and VP-content was promoted to GM when Kucharz left, but not given the title of president.

It’s made strides on the editorial side. Just last month FastCompany picked it as the most innovative company in the finance area for using “a Q&A format with a host of social and game-like features to get Americans talking about money. More as warranted—and please feel free to e-mail me if you have details.

Related Stories
Mar 19, 2010 11:15 PM ET

Hourglass

Share

Posted In: Features, Exclusive, Media & Publishing, Online News, Companies, IAC, News Corp., Dow Jones

  • Mark Hendriksen

    I'd not write off the possibilities with print as Mobile Interaction, Online and Print can actually work in perfect harmony.
    All of these go through transitional periods, as they did when the www 'seemed' to be the end of all print as we knew it, but the fact is it eventually began to work with online and although there is a shift again now, mobile may have an impact too, which could be positive.

    It needs some modern thinking from the Newspaper world though, and Murdoch is a rarity in actually being able to see that whilst many newspapers are still too stuck in the past and not embracing change or future opportunities.

  • Miles Galliford

    I agree that Mr Murdoch has an alternative agenda but I don't think his motivation is promoting print.

    Murdoch, like all the newspaper owners, knows the future of news distribution is online, but he also knows that he cannot charge a subscription for his general online news unless all the publishers do likewise at the same time. If the Times online went paid, readers would simply move to the free Telegraph.oc.uk.

    However competition laws prevent him from having this coversation directly with other newspaper proprietors so he is doing it in public.

    He is trying to build an alliance of newspaper publishers without ever talking to them in private.  His perfect sceneario is that the conversation builds momentum online so it appears to be open and transparent and then all the newspapers move to a subscription model at roughly the same time. Locking up all the quality news content so there aren't any free quality substitutes is the only way the newspapers can get people to pay for access to their online content.

Covering the UK’s Digital Media Economy | paidContent:UK Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors